Once I was
told, “If you don’t have an ideology at 20, you will not have a heart at 50”.
By which it intended to drive home a message that not having an ideology is as good
as not having a heart. For that matter it can be any ideology. Ideologies are
basically ideas which people have a firm belief in and act on. But I must say
that they are also sources of problems especially when they are too extreme and
hard-wired. This made me think whether it is really necessary for me to
subscribe to one.
image courtesy:www.uselections.com |
World is
actually madly-driven by ideologies of various kinds. There are political
ideologies of right and left wingers. Some countries subscribe, prescribe and
impose democracy while others still grow under communist governments. Some
others prosper under laissez-faire. Religious fundamentalism is another deadly
form of ideology. It includes mono-theistic, atheistic activism, and missionary
ideologies in propagandizing their influence and supremacy over one another, often
leading to holy wars and disharmony. History is full of such instances.
For
instance, years after 2008 global financial meltdown, some people blame the aggression
in market for failure, while some contend that it is government intervention that
led to the sub-prime crisis that started in USA. Basically it is a prolonged
debate between right and left winged political ideologists and academicians. There
seems to be enough room for debate either way. But the real issue was not just
from the right or the left; it is in fact caused by an intricate inter-play of
regulations, market forces, devouring greed of Wall Street wolves and more
complex nature of monetary instruments & systemic failures. Wherever the
debates might lead us to, the fact that remains is common people lost their
money & jobs and hurt the global economy in the process. The only people
that benefitted are the wolves (Traders with inside information) and jackals
(the bankers and management) of Wall Street.
On the
political front we have similar stories. Life of Che is a perfect case in
point. Che Guevara was a son of elite Argentine parents and had very good
education & upbringing. His faith in Marxism drove him to the mountains of
Cuba. He led Political revolutions in Cuba along with Fidel Castro and finally
to the forests of Bolivia, his death bed. In pursuit of this idea he caused a
lot of bloodshed. He was finally killed in Bolivia furthering his Anti-US,
Marxist ideology and guerilla warfare. He died a villain death, although his
idea was no worse than any existent ideology.
On the other
hand Buddhist philosophy seems to have understood the limitations of such
extremes and propounded middle path. Middle doesn’t mean center which is
another extreme. Middle in budhist philosophy means anywhere in between. Shantideva said a true budhist practitioner
will not even grasp on this middle path, he will go beyond extremes and achieve
something which is beyond good nor bad, which is free of attachment and
fixation.
In essence
nothing works in extremity. Nothing sustains even if it works. A guitar makes good codes when the strings
are adequately strung. It snaps under extreme pressure and makes no sound when
they are slack. Beyond our craniums the nature
of things are free and uncontrived. These ideologies and constrained extremes
thrive only as a figment of a person’s imagination. These figments can be very
flexible in essence but we choose to constrain saying that we subscribe to a
particular fixated ideology and a pattern of thinking.
At this time
I for one, do not even subscribe to any ideology as such. Which I feel is good
for me because I have freedom of openness to any idea that works better and to
the good of humanity. This does not necessarily mean I do not have goals, ideas
and lines of reasons. I do have all of these but I am not rigidly fixated on
one or a collection of few. If we accept the fact the change is the only
permanent thing, then confinement to rigid and constricted ideologies is not
the way we live.
If human
progress is linked with ideological furtherance then it is equally responsible
for all the ills that progress beget. People fight wars to protect their ideologies;
people make complex humongous markets to sustain their ideologies. People go to
extremes because their ideologies are too extreme and remote, even at the cost
of their lives, resources and humanity which are at best very absurd. Therefore
fixating on a rigid ideology is not a sign of wisdom, it is rather a sign of
shallow understanding of real scheme of things and heightened sense of insecurity.
No comments:
Post a Comment